Claim type · Clinical Negligence

DVT & Blood Clot claims.

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism that should have been prevented with anticoagulants, or diagnosed when symptoms and tests pointed to a clot.

Tell us what happened and we'll show you published judgments like yours, outline what you could be entitled to, and, if you choose, put you in touch with specialist solicitors Tomlin & Partners.

Typical range

£25,000 – £750,000

Limitation period

3 years

G
ClaimGavel Assistant
● Online · DVT & Blood Clot · free & confidential
FREE
TELL US WHAT HAPPENED — TYPE HERE
Our early readAI estimate — a solicitor confirms it
DVT & Blood Clot Claims
Typical range
£25K – £750K
Time limit
3 years

Describe what happened (a sentence or two) to begin.

Free · confidential · not legal adviceEngland
Enquiries for this claim typeIndependent firm · their stated offer

Handled by Tomlin & Partners (SRA 8001484) — “Free, no-obligation consultation with our specialist medical negligence team.”

§ PUBLISHED JUDGMENTS

Real dvt & blood clot cases, decided by the courts.

Every case below is a published judgment of the courts of England and Wales, linked to its source. Summaries are ours; amounts appear only where the judgment states them. We include claims that failed, because they show what has to be proved.

Claimant succeeded£550,000

Alexander v HCA International Limited & Anor

[2026] EWHC 1284 (KB)·2026·Liability decided at trial

A patient developed life-threatening pancreatitis after a gallstone-removal ERCP. The judge found the consultant never prescribed or instructed the standard preventive diclofenac suppository, so it was not given, and entered judgment for £550,000 against him.

Failing to give a recognised prophylactic drug before a procedure can be negligent even in private care. The prescribing doctor, not the hospital, carried the liability here.

Mixed outcome

Jessica Tuffin v University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust

[2024] EWHC 3318 (KB)·2024·Liability decided at trial

After spinal surgery the hospital failed to give Ms Tuffin the prescribed anti-clotting injection, and she developed a deep vein thrombosis and post-thrombotic syndrome; three years later her leg was amputated above the knee. The judge held the trust liable for the DVT and its after-effects but found the amputation was caused by complex regional pain syndrome from the surgery itself, not the clot.

A missed dose of thromboprophylaxis that causes a DVT is negligent, but compensation covers only the harm the clot actually caused. Where a separate condition drives the worst outcome, the claimant must show the negligence at least materially contributed to it.

Claim failed

O'Brien v Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust

[2022] EWHC 2735 (KB)·2022·Liability decided at trial

A man with end-stage kidney failure was given a single 400mg gentamicin dose for a chest infection and suffered permanent balance and hearing damage. His sister's claim failed because the judge accepted that a high dose was a reasonable choice for a worsening infection with sepsis risk, despite his renal impairment.

A drug dose that causes known side-effects is not automatically negligent if it was a reasonable clinical judgement in the circumstances. Departing from a hospital guideline is not itself proof of negligence.

Claim failed

Critchlow v University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust

[2022] EWHC 949 (QB)·2022·Liability decided at trial

A former lorry driver with a history of pulmonary embolism attended A&E and clinics in 2015 with chest pain and calf symptoms; the Trust admitted it should have done a Wells score and imaging at the first visit. The judge found he did not actually have a clot on that date and that the later reduction of his apixaban was not negligent, so the claim failed.

An admitted failure to investigate only leads to compensation if the investigation would have found something. Normal D-dimer results were decisive evidence against a missed clot.

Claimant succeeded

Plan v El-Amir & Anor

[2020] EWHC 2902 (QB)·2020·Liability decided at trial

A 79-year-old with macular degeneration was persuaded to have an intraocular lens implant in her better eye without proper informed consent, then developed raised eye pressure that the surgeon left untreated for five weeks. Stacey J found the surgeon negligent both in consenting and in delaying laser treatment, causing total blindness in that eye.

Private eye surgeons must obtain genuinely informed consent and act promptly on post-operative complications. A delay that materially contributes to permanent damage is enough for liability even if some harm had already occurred.

Claim failed

Doubell v Kings College Hospital NHS Trust

[2020] EWHC 359 (QB)·2020·Appeal decision

A 65-year-old inpatient who became confused at night fell out of bed and hurt her knees, and she argued that bed rails should have been fitted. The trial judge found that rails had not been recommended and would have been removed anyway, and the High Court refused to disturb those findings.

Bed rails are not automatically the safe option, because they can create their own risks for a confused and mobile patient. An appeal court will rarely overturn a trial judge's findings about what nursing staff decided or would have decided.

Browse the case library →

Contains information licensed under the Open Justice - Licence v2.0. Judgments from Find Case Law, The National Archives. Summaries are ours; amounts only where printed in the judgment.

About DVT & Blood Clot Claims Claims

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a blood clot, usually in the leg, that forms when a patient is immobile — classically after a fracture, lower-limb surgery or any long operation. If part of the clot breaks off and travels to the lungs it becomes a pulmonary embolism (PE), which can be fatal. Both are well-understood, largely preventable risks of hospital care.

Under national guidance (NICE guideline NG89), hospitals should assess every adult inpatient's clot risk on admission and, where indicated, give preventative anticoagulant medication (such as heparin injections) and compression stockings. Negligence claims commonly involve a failure to carry out the risk assessment, a failure to prescribe or continue anticoagulation after surgery or a fracture, or a failure to restart it correctly. The second common group is diagnostic: DVT and PE are often missed completely despite classic symptoms — a swollen, painful calf, breathlessness, chest pain — and despite the availability of simple tests such as D-dimer blood tests, ultrasound scans and CT pulmonary angiograms.

An untreated DVT can cause post-thrombotic syndrome — a permanently swollen, painful leg with ulceration — while a missed PE can cause collapse, long-term breathing problems or sudden death. A claim must show that a reasonably competent clinician would have prevented, investigated or treated the clot, and that doing so would probably have avoided the harm.

Compensation typically ranges from £25,000 for resolved clots with avoidable suffering, to £100,000–£750,000 where there is permanent leg damage or lasting cardiorespiratory injury. Fatal PE cases are brought by the family under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976. The limitation period is generally 3 years from the harm or date of knowledge.

Typical Compensation Range

£25Kto£750K

Based on reported settlements and court awards. Individual case values vary significantly.

Limitation Period

3 years

May vary by jurisdiction. Don't wait — time limits apply.

NHS Negligence Data

See real NHS Resolution data related to dvt & blood clot claims claims.

· FREE ASSESSMENT · CONFIDENTIAL · 2 MINUTES ·

Think you might have a dvt & blood clot claims claim?

Our AI assistant will assess your claim in minutes, show you what you could be entitled to, and, if you choose, put you in touch with specialist medical negligence solicitors Tomlin & Partners. Free, confidential, no obligation.

Begin free assessment →