§ PUBLISHED JUDGMENT · 2022

Critchlow v University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust

[2022] EWHC 949 (QB)·High Court (Queen's Bench Division)·26 April 2022

A former lorry driver with a history of pulmonary embolism attended A&E and clinics in 2015 with chest pain and calf symptoms; the Trust admitted it should have done a Wells score and imaging at the first visit. The judge found he did not actually have a clot on that date and that the later reduction of his apixaban was not negligent, so the claim failed.

Outcome

Claim failed

Sum stated in judgment

Not stated

Claim type

DVT & Blood Clot

Decided

Liability decided at trial

G
ClaimGavel Assistant
● Online · DVT & Blood Clot · free & confidential
FREE
TELL US WHAT HAPPENED — TYPE HERE

Start typing — your likely claim, value and time limit appear here.

Describe what happened (a sentence or two) to begin.

Free · confidential · not legal adviceEngland

§ WHAT HAPPENED

The facts, in brief.

Defendant: University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · this trust’s claims data

Injury: Alleged untreated DVT/pulmonary embolism and later harm after anticoagulant dose was reduced

Specialty: Emergency medicine / haematology · England

§ WHAT THE COURT SAID

In the judgment’s own words.

“For the reasons I have given, despite the considerable sympathy I feel for the Claimant, the claim must be dismissed.”

The money

Claim dismissed; no sum stated.

§ WHY IT MATTERS

What this case shows.

An admitted failure to investigate only leads to compensation if the investigation would have found something. Normal D-dimer results were decisive evidence against a missed clot.

About dvt & blood clot claims →

§ MORE DVT & BLOOD CLOT JUDGMENTS

Mixed outcome

Jessica Tuffin v University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust

[2024] EWHC 3318 (KB)·2024·Liability decided at trial

After spinal surgery the hospital failed to give Ms Tuffin the prescribed anti-clotting injection, and she developed a deep vein thrombosis and post-thrombotic syndrome; three years later her leg was amputated above the knee. The judge held the trust liable for the DVT and its after-effects but found the amputation was caused by complex regional pain syndrome from the surgery itself, not the clot.

A missed dose of thromboprophylaxis that causes a DVT is negligent, but compensation covers only the harm the clot actually caused. Where a separate condition drives the worst outcome, the claimant must show the negligence at least materially contributed to it.

All dvt & blood clot judgments →

Contains information licensed under the Open Justice - Licence v2.0. Judgments from Find Case Law, The National Archives. Summaries are ours; amounts only where printed in the judgment.

This guide is general information about the law in England and Wales, not legal advice about your case. ClaimGavel is run by Costart Projects Ltd on behalf of Tomlin & Partners, a specialist medical negligence firm regulated by the SRA. The free assessment on this page is an AI overview to show you roughly where you stand; a solicitor confirms the position in a free, no-obligation conversation.