Claim type · Clinical Negligence

Surgical Errors claims.

Wrong-site surgery, retained instruments, nerve damage, and other surgical mistakes causing patient harm.

Tell us what happened and we'll show you published judgments like yours, outline what you could be entitled to, and, if you choose, put you in touch with specialist solicitors Tomlin & Partners.

Typical range

£10,000 – £1,500,000

Limitation period

3 years

G
ClaimGavel Assistant
● Online · Surgical Errors · free & confidential
FREE
TELL US WHAT HAPPENED — TYPE HERE
Our early readAI estimate — a solicitor confirms it
Surgical Errors
Typical range
£10K – £1.5M
Time limit
3 years

Describe what happened (a sentence or two) to begin.

Free · confidential · not legal adviceEngland
Enquiries for this claim typeIndependent firm · their stated offer

Handled by Tomlin & Partners (SRA 8001484)Free, no-obligation consultation with our specialist medical negligence team.

§ PUBLISHED JUDGMENTS

Real surgical errors cases, decided by the courts.

Every case below is a published judgment of the courts of England and Wales, linked to its source. Summaries are ours; amounts appear only where the judgment states them. We include claims that failed, because they show what has to be proved.

Claimant succeeded£550,000

Alexander v HCA International Limited & Anor

[2026] EWHC 1284 (KB)·2026·Liability decided at trial

A patient developed life-threatening pancreatitis after a gallstone-removal ERCP. The judge found the consultant never prescribed or instructed the standard preventive diclofenac suppository, so it was not given, and entered judgment for £550,000 against him.

Failing to give a recognised prophylactic drug before a procedure can be negligent even in private care. The prescribing doctor, not the hospital, carried the liability here.

Claim failed

Tarrant v Monkhouse

[2025] EWHC 2576 (KB)·2025·Liability decided at trial

After a sleeve gastrectomy the claimant had trouble swallowing; the surgeon performed a gastroscopy and balloon dilatation, after which the sleeve leaked. The judge found no breach of duty in the post-operative care or the dilatation and dismissed the claim despite the very serious consequences.

A bad outcome after a recognised complication is not enough; the claimant must show the treatment decision fell outside what a responsible body of surgeons would do. Sympathy for the patient does not change the legal test.

Claim failed

Julia Tosh v Vivek Gupta

[2025] EWHC 2025 (KB)·2025·Liability decided at trial

The claimant developed anal stenosis after a private haemorrhoidectomy and argued her haemorrhoids had been over-graded, non-surgical options were not discussed and the stenosis risk was not explained. The judge found the grading was correct, alternatives were discussed and the risk was disclosed on the consent form and in the information leaflet, so the claim was dismissed.

Documented consent, including a signed form and a written leaflet naming the specific complication, can be decisive in defeating a Montgomery consent claim.

Claimant succeeded

MJF v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

[2024] EWHC 3156 (KB)·2024·Liability decided at trial

A young woman with cerebral palsy had a PEG feeding tube inserted and was found unresponsive two days later with peritonitis and sepsis. The judge rejected the doctor's account of how the tube was fixed, found it was placed under too much tension, and entered judgment for the claimant.

Where a clinician's recollection is unreliable and contradicted by the physical evidence, the court can find a procedure was done negligently. Causation may still be limited where a pre-existing condition would have deteriorated anyway.

Claim failed

Philippa Caroline Deakin-Stephenson v Nebil Behar and Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

[2024] EWHC 2338 (KB)·2024·Liability decided at trial

Admitted with perforated diverticulitis, the claimant had a laparoscopic washout and deteriorated about 36 hours later, needing an emergency Hartmann's procedure with a stoma and intensive care. She alleged she had asked for a colorectal referral, was improperly moved to private care and was not properly consented, but the judge found none of this proved and dismissed the claims against both the surgeon and the trust.

Consent disputes turn on evidence of what was actually discussed; where the records and the surgeon's account show the alternative procedure was explained, a claim based on inadequate consent is likely to fail.

Claim failed

Ward v Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

[2023] EWHC 2803 (KB)·2023·Liability decided at trial

Mr Ward's stomach was perforated during keyhole removal of a gastric band; the hole was not seen during the operation and was repaired the following morning after he deteriorated. The judge found the perforation was not visible at the time and so there was no negligent failure to identify and repair it.

A perforation missed during surgery is only negligent if there was visible evidence the surgeon should have seen. Post-operative pain that leads to timely re-operation may not give rise to a claim.

Browse the case library →

Contains information licensed under the Open Justice - Licence v2.0. Judgments from Find Case Law, The National Archives. Summaries are ours; amounts only where printed in the judgment.

About Surgical Errors Claims

Surgical error claims arise when a surgeon or surgical team makes a preventable mistake during an operation — or delays an operation that was urgently needed — causing injury to the patient. These errors can occur during any type of surgery, from routine procedures to complex operations, and span general, gastrointestinal and colorectal surgery.

Abdominal surgery produces a recognisable pattern of serious claims. A delayed appendicectomy can allow the appendix to rupture, causing peritonitis (major infection in the abdomen) and the need for major open surgery. Gall bladder removal carries a recognised serious complication: severing the common bile duct, which leads to bile leakage, peritonitis and complex reconstructive surgery. It can happen even with careful surgery — but a claim may arise where the duct was misidentified in circumstances where safe technique should have prevented it, or where the injury went unrecognised and untreated. An incarcerated hernia left unrepaired can strangulate, and bowel perforated during surgery — or bowel damage left unrecognised — can become infected and gangrenous, leaving the patient with a stoma bag that competent care would have avoided.

Other common surgical errors include wrong-site surgery (operating on the wrong body part), retained surgical instruments (leaving swabs, clips, or tools inside the patient), nerve damage during surgery, unnecessary surgery based on incorrect diagnosis, and complications from performing procedures beyond the surgeon's competence.

The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist is a critical standard — NHS trusts are required to follow it before every operation. Failures in the checklist process are powerful evidence. Consent issues under Montgomery v Lanarkshire (2015) are also relevant: surgeons must inform patients of material risks.

Compensation depends on the severity of the outcome. Minor surgical errors requiring corrective procedures typically settle for £10,000 to £50,000. Serious errors — bile duct injuries, peritonitis, a stoma that should never have been needed, or permanent disability — can result in awards of £100,000 to £2 million or more. The limitation period is 3 years from the date of injury or the date of knowledge.

Typical Compensation Range

£10Kto£2M

Based on reported settlements and court awards. Individual case values vary significantly.

Limitation Period

3 years

May vary by jurisdiction. Don't wait — time limits apply.

NHS Negligence Data

See real NHS Resolution data related to surgical errors claims.

· FREE ASSESSMENT · CONFIDENTIAL · 2 MINUTES ·

Think you might have a surgical errors claim?

Our AI assistant will assess your claim in minutes, show you what you could be entitled to, and, if you choose, put you in touch with specialist medical negligence solicitors Tomlin & Partners. Free, confidential, no obligation.

Begin free assessment →