Claim type · Clinical Negligence

GP Negligence claims.

Negligent treatment by general practitioners including failure to refer, prescribing errors, and missed symptoms in primary care.

Tell us what happened and we'll show you published judgments like yours, outline what you could be entitled to, and, if you choose, put you in touch with specialist solicitors Tomlin & Partners.

Typical range

£10,000 – £500,000

Limitation period

3 years

G
ClaimGavel Assistant
● Online · GP Negligence · free & confidential
FREE
TELL US WHAT HAPPENED — TYPE HERE
Our early readAI estimate — a solicitor confirms it
GP Negligence
Typical range
£10K – £500K
Time limit
3 years

Describe what happened (a sentence or two) to begin.

Free · confidential · not legal adviceEngland
Enquiries for this claim typeIndependent firm · their stated offer

Handled by Tomlin & Partners (SRA 8001484)Free, no-obligation consultation with our specialist medical negligence team.

§ PUBLISHED JUDGMENTS

Real gp negligence cases, decided by the courts.

Every case below is a published judgment of the courts of England and Wales, linked to its source. Summaries are ours; amounts appear only where the judgment states them. We include claims that failed, because they show what has to be proved.

Claimant succeeded£550,000

Alexander v HCA International Limited & Anor

[2026] EWHC 1284 (KB)·2026·Liability decided at trial

A patient developed life-threatening pancreatitis after a gallstone-removal ERCP. The judge found the consultant never prescribed or instructed the standard preventive diclofenac suppository, so it was not given, and entered judgment for £550,000 against him.

Failing to give a recognised prophylactic drug before a procedure can be negligent even in private care. The prescribing doctor, not the hospital, carried the liability here.

Claimant succeeded

Shaheen & Anor v Dr Joanna Daish

[2025] EWHC 3056 (KB)·2025·Liability decided at trial

A 49-year-old man saw his GP with breathlessness and a persistent cough; the GP ordered a chest X-ray on the computer system but the judge found she never told him to go to the walk-in radiology department. The court held he would have attended if told and was not himself at fault.

Ordering a test is not enough; the patient must be told clearly what to do. Courts are slow to blame patients for not chasing a test they did not know had been requested.

Claimant succeeded

Philipa Hodgson v Dr Daniel Hammond & Anor

[2025] EWHC 1261 (KB)·2025·Liability decided at trial

Ms Hodgson saw a locum GP who suspected pelvic inflammatory disease but did not examine her or arrange urgent follow-up, and a second GP reviewing her blood results by telephone did not refer her for examination. The delay in treatment led to an abscess, removal of a fallopian tube and chronic pelvic pain.

When a GP suspects a serious infection, the court expects an examination or urgent referral to rule it out, and a telephone review of test results does not replace that. Both GPs were held liable, with damages to be decided separately.

Claimant succeeded

Gurmukh Gahir v Dr Ayodele Olusgun Ola

[2024] EWHC 390 (KB)·2024·Liability decided at trial

Mr Gahir went to his GP with fever, severe headache, nausea and confusion; the GP diagnosed migraine, and he was not admitted to hospital until 55 hours later, when herpes simplex encephalitis was treated with acyclovir. The judge found the combination of fever, headache and confusion required urgent hospital referral and that earlier treatment would have left him far less disabled.

Fever, headache and confusion together are a recognised red flag for brain infection, and a GP who attributes them to migraine without arranging urgent admission may be found negligent. The judge accepted the family's account of the patient's confusion during the consultation.

Claim failed

Canavan v Gaynor

[2023] EWHC 1911 (KB)·2023·Liability decided at trial

A woman attended a GP drop-in clinic with groin pain after an injection had missed the vein; the GP diagnosed a haematoma and sent her away with painkillers, and days later she was admitted with necrotising fasciitis and her right leg was amputated at the hip. The judge found the GP's examination and diagnosis were ones a reasonable body of GPs would support, so the claim failed despite the defendant accepting that referral would have saved her leg.

Even where a devastating outcome and causation are accepted, a claim fails unless the clinician's decision fell outside what a responsible body of practitioners would have done. A properly documented history and examination that reasonably excluded infection was a complete defence.

Claim failed

Edward Graham v Dr Simone Altaf

[2023] EWHC 156 (KB)·2023·Liability decided at trial

A three-year-old was diagnosed with tonsillitis by a GP registrar, deteriorated over the next two days and was then referred to hospital, where meningococcal meningitis was diagnosed. The court found no causative breach of duty and dismissed the claim.

Meningitis claims against GPs often fail because early symptoms genuinely resemble common childhood infections; the claimant must show both that the GP fell below a reasonable standard and that earlier referral would have changed the outcome.

Browse the case library →

Contains information licensed under the Open Justice - Licence v2.0. Judgments from Find Case Law, The National Archives. Summaries are ours; amounts only where printed in the judgment.

About GP Negligence Claims

GP negligence claims arise when a general practitioner fails to provide the standard of care expected of a reasonably competent GP, causing harm to the patient. GPs are the gatekeepers to specialist services: for most patients, nothing happens — no scan, no consultant, no urgent treatment — unless the GP recognises the problem and refers to the right specialty or, in an emergency, straight to A&E. That gatekeeping role is why GP failures sit behind so many serious claims.

Common GP negligence claims include failure to spot the signs of a serious condition and refer to the right specialist or the emergency department (missed cancers, sepsis, heart problems, cauda equina red flags), prescribing errors (wrong medication, wrong dose, dangerous drug interactions), failure to act on abnormal test results, inadequate examination or history-taking, and failure to follow up on patient concerns.

The urgent suspected cancer referral pathway (formerly known as the "two-week wait") is particularly relevant — NICE guideline NG12 sets out the red-flag symptoms that should prompt an urgent referral, and in England these referrals are now measured against the Faster Diagnosis Standard, which expects cancer to be confirmed or ruled out within 28 days. For care before October 2023, the two-week wait was the applicable standard. A failure to refer when symptoms clearly warranted it can be strong evidence of negligence.

GP practices carry medical defence organisation cover or NHS indemnity. Compensation depends on the harm caused by the delay or error. Failure to refer leading to advanced cancer typically settles for £100,000 to £500,000. Prescribing errors causing harm range from £10,000 to £200,000. The limitation period is 3 years from the date of injury or knowledge.

Typical Compensation Range

£10Kto£500K

Based on reported settlements and court awards. Individual case values vary significantly.

Limitation Period

3 years

May vary by jurisdiction. Don't wait — time limits apply.

NHS Negligence Data

See real NHS Resolution data related to gp negligence claims.

· FREE ASSESSMENT · CONFIDENTIAL · 2 MINUTES ·

Think you might have a gp negligence claim?

Our AI assistant will assess your claim in minutes, show you what you could be entitled to, and, if you choose, put you in touch with specialist medical negligence solicitors Tomlin & Partners. Free, confidential, no obligation.

Begin free assessment →