§ PUBLISHED JUDGMENT · 2017

Rathore v Bedford Hospitals NHS Trust

[2017] EWHC 863 (QB)·High Court (Queen's Bench Division)·25 April 2017

Swabs taken after childbirth showed chlamydia but neither the patient nor her GP was told, and it went untreated for about a year; she suffered repeated pain and an ectopic pregnancy requiring removal of a fallopian tube. The trust admitted breach; the court accepted the ectopic pregnancy and a period of pain disorder were caused by the negligence but rejected the claim that her later chronic widespread pain was.

Outcome

Claimant succeeded

Sum stated in judgment

£68,742

Claim type

Maternal Birth Injury

Decided

Damages assessed at trial

G
ClaimGavel Assistant
● Online · Maternal Birth Injury · free & confidential
FREE
TELL US WHAT HAPPENED — TYPE HERE

Start typing — your likely claim, value and time limit appear here.

Describe what happened (a sentence or two) to begin.

Free · confidential · not legal adviceEngland

§ WHAT HAPPENED

The facts, in brief.

Defendant: Bedford Hospitals NHS Trust

Injury: Untreated chlamydia for a year causing pain, an ectopic pregnancy and removal of a fallopian tube

Specialty: Gynaecology / postnatal care · England

§ WHAT THE COURT SAID

In the judgment’s own words.

“For these reasons, the total is £53,055 plus £4257 plus £9362.16 plus £1124.70 plus £943.52 making a grand total of £68,742.38. Accordingly the claimant will recover this sum by way of damages.”

The money

Liability admitted; damages assessed at a grand total of £68,742.38 including £50,000 general damages plus interest.

§ WHY IT MATTERS

What this case shows.

Failing to pass on an abnormal test result is a clear breach, but the claimant still has to prove which later problems flowed from it. Long-term pain conditions are hard to attribute to a delayed diagnosis.

About maternal birth injury claims →

§ MORE MATERNAL BIRTH INJURY JUDGMENTS

Settlement approved£3.85M

ERE v East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust

[2024] EWHC 2569 (KB)·2024·Settlement approved by the court

A 23-year-old mother was discharged after giving birth in July 2015, developed breathlessness and palpitations, and suffered a cardiac arrest after being readmitted, leaving her with severe hypoxic brain damage. The claim settled on the day the quantum trial was due to start and the court approved the package for her as a protected party.

Maternal claims are not limited to injuries during labour itself; a failure in care in the weeks after birth that causes brain injury can lead to a multi-million-pound settlement. Where the injured person lacks capacity, a judge must approve any settlement.

Settlement approved£2.5M

CTQ v King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

[2023] EWHC 2975 (KB)·2023·Settlement approved by the court

A 37-year-old mother suffered a cardiac arrest because intravenous fluids were not given during spinal anaesthesia just after her daughter's birth, leaving her with a brain injury; the hospital admitted liability. The court used its inherent jurisdiction to approve a settlement worth roughly £5.56m including periodical payments.

Anaesthetic errors around delivery can found a maternal negligence claim even when the baby is unharmed. Courts can approve settlements for adults with cognitive impairment even where they have not formally been found to lack capacity.

Claim failed

Manzi v King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

[2016] EWHC 1101 (QB)·2016·Liability decided at trial

A mother alleged that a registrar negligently failed to spot on an ultrasound that a substantial piece of placenta had been left behind after birth, leading to infection and an emergency operation two weeks later. The parties agreed the claim depended on proving a substantial (about 7 cm) piece was retained, and the judge was not persuaded of that on the evidence.

Retained placenta claims often turn on what the scan would actually have shown; if the retained tissue was small, a missed scan finding may not be negligent. Agreed thresholds for success can decide a case.

All maternal birth injury judgments →

Contains information licensed under the Open Justice - Licence v2.0. Judgments from Find Case Law, The National Archives. Summaries are ours; amounts only where printed in the judgment.

This guide is general information about the law in England and Wales, not legal advice about your case. ClaimGavel is run by Costart Projects Ltd on behalf of Tomlin & Partners, a specialist medical negligence firm regulated by the SRA. The free assessment on this page is an AI overview to show you roughly where you stand; a solicitor confirms the position in a free, no-obligation conversation.